Independent. Not owned by or funded by any pharmaceutical manufacturer.
Evidence-sourced · medically-reviewed where indicated
The authorities behind our content

Our Sources

We don’t ask you to trust us — we show you our work. These are the 27 recognised authorities we draw information from, grouped by how much weight they carry in our evidence hierarchy. For any given claim, we cite the strongest source available, and we go to these primaries rather than summarising other websites.

What listing a source does and doesn’t mean

These organisations are sources we cite. Listing them here does not imply they endorse, review, or are affiliated with GLP-1 Healthcare. Any page that has been reviewed by a named clinician says so explicitly, with that person’s real credentials.

Regulatory & government

8 sources

The highest-authority sources for what a drug is approved to do, its labeled risks, and how it is covered. We treat these as the operational baseline.

Approval status, approved indications, boxed warnings, and MedWatch safety communications.

fda.gov
U.S. National Library of Medicine

The official, current FDA-approved prescribing information (drug labels).

dailymed.nlm.nih.gov
FDA

Approval history and regulatory documents for each product.

accessdata.fda.gov
National Institutes of Health

Diabetes, obesity, and metabolic-disease background from a government research body.

niddk.nih.gov
U.S. National Library of Medicine

Plain-language patient drug and condition information.

medlineplus.gov

Obesity and diabetes prevalence and surveillance data.

cdc.gov

Federal coverage rules that shape what patients actually pay.

medicare.gov

International label cross-checks and safety signals.

ema.europa.eu

Professional societies & guidelines

8 sources

Consensus clinical guidance from the bodies that set standards of care. We cite the guideline, its issuing body, and its publication year.

The annually updated Standards of Care in Diabetes.

diabetes.org

Clinical practice guidelines for hormonal and metabolic conditions.

endocrine.org

Obesity-treatment algorithms and clinical guidance.

obesitymedicine.org

Position statements and the journal Obesity.

obesity.org

Endocrinology and obesity clinical guidelines.

aace.com

GLP-1 guidance on gastrointestinal effects and peri-procedural use.

gastro.org

Guidance on holding GLP-1 medications before anesthesia.

asahq.org

Cardiovascular-risk context for metabolic medications.

heart.org

Peer-reviewed literature & trials

6 sources

Primary evidence from the clinical trials and journals that establish efficacy and safety. We link the specific study and record its date.

Publisher of many of the pivotal GLP-1 efficacy and outcomes trials.

nejm.org

Peer-reviewed trials, meta-analyses, and clinical reviews.

jamanetwork.com

Pivotal metabolic-medicine trials and reviews.

thelancet.com

Independent systematic reviews of the evidence base.

cochranelibrary.com
U.S. National Library of Medicine

The literature index we search to find and verify primary studies.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Trial registry — including the STEP, SUSTAIN, SELECT, SURPASS, SURMOUNT, and SURMOUNT-OSA programs we reference.

clinicaltrials.gov

Manufacturer prescribing information

2 sources

The definitive source for approved dosing, indications, contraindications, and labeled adverse events — read as primary label data, not marketing.

Label data for Ozempic, Wegovy, Rybelsus, and Saxenda.

novonordisk.com

Label data for Mounjaro and Zepbound.

lilly.com

Reputable secondary references

3 sources

Used only to cross-check and orient — never as a sole source, and never in place of a primary citation.

Cross-checking patient-facing explanations against an established institution.

mayoclinic.org

Cross-checking clinical explanations and patient guidance.

my.clevelandclinic.org
U.S. National Library of Medicine

Peer-reviewed clinical reference summaries.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Notice something out of date?

Guidelines and labels change. If a source here has been superseded, or you think we should be citing something stronger, tell us and we’ll review it. See our Editorial Policy for how corrections work.